Cure53 vs SEC Consult: privacy compared
Cure53 and SEC Consult are both rated in security audit firms against the same 4 public criteria. Cure53 does better on publishes full reports, audits open-source projects and no trackers on website. Cure53 is based in Germany (Fourteen Eyes); SEC Consult is based in Austria.
| Criterion | Cure53 Our pick | SEC Consult |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade A A (100/100) | Grade F F (14/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany Fourteen Eyes | Austria Outside Eyes |
| Publishes full reports Are full audit reports routinely published, with client consent, rather than only summaries or badges? | Yes source | No |
| Audits open-source projects Does the firm regularly audit open-source software and non-profit projects? | Yes source | No |
| Public research Does the firm publish security research, advisories or tools? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No trackers on website Is the firm's website free of third-party trackers? | Yes source | No |
Summaries
Cure53. Cure53 scores 100 out of 100 (grade A) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 4 of 4 criteria: publishes full reports, audits open-source projects, public research and no trackers on website. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.
SEC Consult. SEC Consult scores 14 out of 100 (grade F) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 1 of 4 criteria: public research. It does not meet publishes full reports, audits open-source projects and no trackers on website. It is based in Austria: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.