Cure53 vs Radically Open Security: privacy compared
Cure53 and Radically Open Security are both rated in security audit firms against the same 4 public criteria. Cure53 is based in Germany (Fourteen Eyes); Radically Open Security is based in the Netherlands (Nine Eyes).
| Criterion | Cure53 Our pick | Radically Open Security |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade A A (100/100) | Grade A A (93/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany Fourteen Eyes | Netherlands Nine Eyes |
| Publishes full reports Are full audit reports routinely published, with client consent, rather than only summaries or badges? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Audits open-source projects Does the firm regularly audit open-source software and non-profit projects? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Public research Does the firm publish security research, advisories or tools? | Yes source | Partial source |
| No trackers on website Is the firm's website free of third-party trackers? | Yes source | Yes source |
Which is more private, Cure53 or Radically Open Security?
Cure53 scores higher on the public criteria: 100 out of 100, against 93 for Radically Open Security. Cure53 does better on public research. How scoring works
Summaries
Cure53. Cure53 scores 100 out of 100 (grade A) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 4 of 4 criteria: publishes full reports, audits open-source projects, public research and no trackers on website. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B and Internet.nl website score 62%.
Radically Open Security. Radically Open Security scores 93 out of 100 (grade A) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: publishes full reports, audits open-source projects and no trackers on website. It partly meets public research. It is based in the Netherlands: Nine Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B and Internet.nl website score 100%.
Compare all 16 security audit firms