Privacy Ratings

Cure53 vs NCC Group: privacy compared

Cure53 and NCC Group are both rated in security audit firms against the same 4 public criteria. Cure53 does better on no trackers on website. Cure53 is based in Germany (Fourteen Eyes); NCC Group is based in the United Kingdom (Five Eyes).

Cure53 compared with NCC Group
CriterionCure53 Our pickNCC Group
GradeGrade A A (100/100)Grade B B (86/100)
JurisdictionGermany Fourteen EyesUnited Kingdom Five Eyes
Publishes full reports
Are full audit reports routinely published, with client consent, rather than only summaries or badges?
Yes sourceYes source
Audits open-source projects
Does the firm regularly audit open-source software and non-profit projects?
Yes sourceYes source
Public research
Does the firm publish security research, advisories or tools?
Yes sourceYes source
No trackers on website
Is the firm's website free of third-party trackers?
Yes sourceNo

Summaries

Cure53. Cure53 scores 100 out of 100 (grade A) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 4 of 4 criteria: publishes full reports, audits open-source projects, public research and no trackers on website. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

NCC Group. NCC Group scores 86 out of 100 (grade B) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: publishes full reports, audits open-source projects and public research. It does not meet no trackers on website. It is based in the United Kingdom: Five Eyes member; GDPR-style data protection law; CLOUD Act data access agreement with the US. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B-.

Compare all 16 security audit firms