Privacy Ratings

Cure53 vs Include Security: privacy compared

Cure53 and Include Security are both rated in security audit firms against the same 4 public criteria. Cure53 does better on publishes full reports, audits open-source projects and no trackers on website. Cure53 is based in Germany (Fourteen Eyes); Include Security is based in the United States (Five Eyes).

Cure53 compared with Include Security
CriterionCure53 Our pickInclude Security
GradeGrade A A (100/100)Grade F F (14/100)
JurisdictionGermany Fourteen EyesUnited States Five Eyes
Publishes full reports
Are full audit reports routinely published, with client consent, rather than only summaries or badges?
Yes sourceNo
Audits open-source projects
Does the firm regularly audit open-source software and non-profit projects?
Yes sourceNo
Public research
Does the firm publish security research, advisories or tools?
Yes sourceYes source
No trackers on website
Is the firm's website free of third-party trackers?
Yes sourceNo

Summaries

Cure53. Cure53 scores 100 out of 100 (grade A) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 4 of 4 criteria: publishes full reports, audits open-source projects, public research and no trackers on website. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Include Security. Include Security scores 14 out of 100 (grade F) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 1 of 4 criteria: public research. It does not meet publishes full reports, audits open-source projects and no trackers on website. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade C-.

Compare all 16 security audit firms