DuckDuckGo vs Qwant: privacy compared
DuckDuckGo and Qwant are both rated in search engines against the same 12 public criteria. DuckDuckGo is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Qwant is based in France (Nine Eyes).
| Criterion | DuckDuckGo Our pick | Qwant |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade C C (70/100) | Grade F F (24/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States Five Eyes | France Nine Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Partial source | No |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Yes source | No source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Partial source | Partial source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | No | No |
| Transparency report Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds? | Partial source | No |
| Tells users about requests Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it? | Yes source | No |
| TLS configuration Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Security headers Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better? | Partial source | Partial source |
| Modern web standards Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test? | No source | Partial source |
| No search history logs Are searches stored without IP addresses or other identifiers? | Yes source | No source |
| No profile-based ads Are ads (if any) based only on the current search, not a profile? | Yes source | Partial source |
| No account needed Can every feature be used without an account? | Yes source | Partial source |
Which is more private, DuckDuckGo or Qwant?
DuckDuckGo scores higher on the public criteria: 70 out of 100, against 24 for Qwant. DuckDuckGo does better on open source, no trackers or telemetry, transparency report, tells users about requests, no search history logs, no profile-based ads and no account needed. Qwant does better on modern web standards. How scoring works
Summaries
DuckDuckGo. DuckDuckGo scores 70 out of 100 (grade C) on the search engines criteria. It meets 6 of 12 criteria: no trackers or telemetry, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, no search history logs, no profile-based ads and no account needed. It partly meets open source, no ads or data sales, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet independent audit and modern web standards. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B and Internet.nl website score 61%.
Qwant. Qwant scores 24 out of 100 (grade F) on the search engines criteria. It meets 1 of 12 criteria: TLS configuration. It partly meets no ads or data sales, security headers, modern web standards, no profile-based ads and no account needed. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit, transparency report, tells users about requests and no search history logs. It is based in France: Nine Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B and Internet.nl website score 84%.