DuckDuckGo vs Kagi: privacy compared
DuckDuckGo and Kagi are both rated in search engines against the same 12 public criteria. DuckDuckGo is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Kagi is based in the United States (Five Eyes).
| Criterion | DuckDuckGo Our pick | Kagi |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade C C (70/100) | Grade D D (52/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States Five Eyes | United States Five Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Partial source | No |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Partial source | Yes source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | No | No |
| Transparency report Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds? | Partial source | Partial source |
| Tells users about requests Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it? | Yes source | No |
| TLS configuration Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Partial source |
| Security headers Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better? | Partial source | Partial source |
| Modern web standards Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test? | No source | Yes source |
| No search history logs Are searches stored without IP addresses or other identifiers? | Yes source | Partial source |
| No profile-based ads Are ads (if any) based only on the current search, not a profile? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No account needed Can every feature be used without an account? | Yes source | No source |
Which is more private, DuckDuckGo or Kagi?
DuckDuckGo scores higher on the public criteria: 70 out of 100, against 52 for Kagi. DuckDuckGo does better on open source, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, no search history logs and no account needed. Kagi does better on no ads or data sales and modern web standards. How scoring works
Summaries
DuckDuckGo. DuckDuckGo scores 70 out of 100 (grade C) on the search engines criteria. It meets 6 of 12 criteria: no trackers or telemetry, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, no search history logs, no profile-based ads and no account needed. It partly meets open source, no ads or data sales, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet independent audit and modern web standards. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B and Internet.nl website score 61%.
Kagi. Kagi scores 52 out of 100 (grade D) on the search engines criteria. It meets 4 of 12 criteria: no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, modern web standards and no profile-based ads. It partly meets transparency report, TLS configuration, security headers and no search history logs. It does not meet open source, independent audit, tells users about requests and no account needed. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade B, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B and Internet.nl website score 95%.