GrapheneOS vs /e/OS: privacy compared
GrapheneOS and /e/OS are both rated in mobile operating systems against the same 4 public criteria. GrapheneOS does better on open source and no trackers or telemetry.
| Criterion | GrapheneOS Our pick | /e/OS |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade B B (80/100) | Grade D D (50/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | France Nine Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | Partial source |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Yes source | Partial source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | No | No |
Summaries
GrapheneOS. GrapheneOS scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the mobile operating systems criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.
/e/OS. /e/OS scores 50 out of 100 (grade D) on the mobile operating systems criteria. It meets 1 of 4 criteria: no ads or data sales. It partly meets open source and no trackers or telemetry. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in France: Nine Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).