GrapheneOS vs Android: privacy compared
GrapheneOS and Android are both rated in mobile operating systems against the same 4 public criteria.
| Criterion | GrapheneOS Our pick | Android |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade B B (80/100) | Grade F F (25/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | United States Five Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | Partial source |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Yes source | No source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | No source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | No | Partial source |
Which is more private, GrapheneOS or Android?
GrapheneOS scores higher on the public criteria: 80 out of 100, against 25 for Android. GrapheneOS does better on open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. Android does better on independent audit. How scoring works
Summaries
GrapheneOS. GrapheneOS scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the mobile operating systems criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.
Android. Android scores 25 out of 100 (grade F) on the mobile operating systems criteria. It partly meets open source and independent audit. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act.
Compare all 10 mobile operating systems