Forward Email vs Atomic Mail: privacy compared

Forward Email and Atomic Mail are both rated in email providers against the same 21 public criteria. Forward Email is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Atomic Mail is based in Estonia.

Forward Email compared with Atomic Mail
Criterion	Forward Email Our pick	Atomic Mail
Grade	Grade A A (98/100)	Grade F F (25/100)
Jurisdiction	United States Five Eyes	Estonia Outside Eyes
Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public?	Yes source	No source
No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default?	Yes source	No source
No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data?	Yes source	Yes source
Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years?	Yes source	No source
Transparency report Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds?	Partial source	Partial source
Tells users about requests Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it?	Yes source	No
TLS configuration Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better?	Yes source	Partial source
Security headers Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better?	Yes source	No source
Modern web standards Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test?	Yes source	Partial source
End-to-end encryption Can mail be end-to-end encrypted so that the provider cannot read message contents?	Yes source	Partial source
Encrypted mailbox storage Is stored mail encrypted with a key the provider does not hold?	Yes source	Partial source
Open protocols Can any standard app connect over IMAP, POP3, SMTP, CalDAV or CardDAV, without extra software?	Yes source	No source
Custom domains Can mail be sent and received with your own domain?	Yes source	Partial source
Sign up without personal data Can an account be created without a phone number or another email address?	Yes source	Yes source
Email security standards Does the mail domain score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl email test?	Yes source	No source
IMAP support Does the IMAP server accept connections over implicit TLS on port 993 and advertise IMAP4rev1 or IMAP4rev2 with IDLE push?	Yes	No
POP3 support Does the POP3 server accept connections over implicit TLS on port 995 and answer CAPA with UIDL?	Yes	No
SMTP submission Does mail submission work over implicit TLS on port 465 with SMTPUTF8, 8BITMIME, PIPELINING and AUTH?	Yes	No
Mail transport security Does the mail domain enforce encrypted, authenticated delivery with MTA-STS, DANE, DNSSEC, TLS-RPT and an enforced DMARC policy?	Yes	No
Sender Rewriting Scheme Is the envelope sender rewritten with SRS when mail is forwarded, so forwarded mail keeps passing SPF?	Yes source	No
ARC sealing Does the provider validate and add ARC (RFC 8617) signatures, so authentication results survive forwarding?	Yes source	No

Which is more private, Forward Email or Atomic Mail?

Forward Email scores higher on the public criteria: 98 out of 100, against 25 for Atomic Mail. Forward Email does better on open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, security headers, modern web standards, end-to-end encryption, encrypted mailbox storage, open protocols, custom domains, email security standards, IMAP support, POP3 support, SMTP submission, mail transport security, Sender Rewriting Scheme and ARC sealing. Disclosure. Privacy Ratings is maintained by the team behind Forward Email. This entry is scored by the same criteria as every other email provider, and changes to it are reviewed under the published conflict-of-interest rules. How scoring works

Summaries

Forward Email. Forward Email scores 98 out of 100 (grade A) on the email providers criteria. It meets 20 of 21 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, independent audit, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, security headers, modern web standards, end-to-end encryption, encrypted mailbox storage, open protocols, custom domains, sign up without personal data, email security standards, IMAP support, POP3 support, SMTP submission, mail transport security, Sender Rewriting Scheme and ARC sealing. It partly meets transparency report. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+, Internet.nl website score 100% and Internet.nl email score 100%.

Atomic Mail. Atomic Mail scores 25 out of 100 (grade F) on the email providers criteria. It meets 2 of 21 criteria: no ads or data sales and sign up without personal data. It partly meets transparency report, TLS configuration, modern web standards, end-to-end encryption, encrypted mailbox storage and custom domains. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit, tells users about requests, security headers, open protocols, email security standards, IMAP support, POP3 support, SMTP submission, mail transport security, Sender Rewriting Scheme and ARC sealing. It is based in Estonia: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A-, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade C-, Internet.nl website score 75% and Internet.nl email score 64%.

Compare all 44 email providers

Forward Email vs Atomic Mail: privacy compared

Which is more private, Forward Email or Atomic Mail?

Summaries

Comparisons

Language