Forward Email vs Riseup: privacy compared
Forward Email and Riseup are both rated in email providers against the same 21 public criteria. Forward Email is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Riseup is based in the United States (Five Eyes).
| Criterion | Forward Email Our pick | Riseup |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade A A (98/100) | Grade D D (55/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States Five Eyes | United States Five Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | Partial source |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | Yes source | No |
| Transparency report Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds? | Partial source | Partial source |
| Tells users about requests Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it? | Yes source | No |
| TLS configuration Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Security headers Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Partial source |
| Modern web standards Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test? | Yes source | No source |
| End-to-end encryption Can mail be end-to-end encrypted so that the provider cannot read message contents? | Yes source | No |
| Encrypted mailbox storage Is stored mail encrypted with a key the provider does not hold? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Open protocols Can any standard app connect over IMAP, POP3, SMTP, CalDAV or CardDAV, without extra software? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Custom domains Can mail be sent and received with your own domain? | Yes source | No |
| Sign up without personal data Can an account be created without a phone number or another email address? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Email security standards Does the mail domain score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl email test? | Yes source | No source |
| IMAP support Does the IMAP server accept connections over implicit TLS on port 993 and advertise IMAP4rev1 or IMAP4rev2 with IDLE push? | Yes | Yes |
| POP3 support Does the POP3 server accept connections over implicit TLS on port 995 and answer CAPA with UIDL? | Yes | Yes |
| SMTP submission Does mail submission work over implicit TLS on port 465 with SMTPUTF8, 8BITMIME, PIPELINING and AUTH? | Yes | Yes |
| Mail transport security Does the mail domain enforce encrypted, authenticated delivery with MTA-STS, DANE, DNSSEC, TLS-RPT and an enforced DMARC policy? | Yes | No |
| Sender Rewriting Scheme Is the envelope sender rewritten with SRS when mail is forwarded, so forwarded mail keeps passing SPF? | Yes source | No |
| ARC sealing Does the provider validate and add ARC (RFC 8617) signatures, so authentication results survive forwarding? | Yes source | No |
Which is more private, Forward Email or Riseup?
Forward Email scores higher on the public criteria: 98 out of 100, against 55 for Riseup. Forward Email does better on open source, independent audit, tells users about requests, security headers, modern web standards, end-to-end encryption, custom domains, email security standards, mail transport security, Sender Rewriting Scheme and ARC sealing. Disclosure. Privacy Ratings is maintained by the team behind Forward Email. This entry is scored by the same criteria as every other email provider, and changes to it are reviewed under the published conflict-of-interest rules. How scoring works
Summaries
Forward Email. Forward Email scores 98 out of 100 (grade A) on the email providers criteria. It meets 20 of 21 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, independent audit, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, security headers, modern web standards, end-to-end encryption, encrypted mailbox storage, open protocols, custom domains, sign up without personal data, email security standards, IMAP support, POP3 support, SMTP submission, mail transport security, Sender Rewriting Scheme and ARC sealing. It partly meets transparency report. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+, Internet.nl website score 100% and Internet.nl email score 100%.
Riseup. Riseup scores 55 out of 100 (grade D) on the email providers criteria. It meets 9 of 21 criteria: no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, TLS configuration, encrypted mailbox storage, open protocols, sign up without personal data, IMAP support, POP3 support and SMTP submission. It partly meets open source, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet independent audit, tells users about requests, modern web standards, end-to-end encryption, custom domains, email security standards, mail transport security, Sender Rewriting Scheme and ARC sealing. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B, Internet.nl website score 66% and Internet.nl email score 61%.
Compare all 44 email providers
Comparisons
- Forward Email vs mailbox.org
- Forward Email vs StartMail
- Forward Email vs CounterMail
- Forward Email vs Kolab Now
- Forward Email vs Posteo
- Forward Email vs Aster Mail
- Forward Email vs Tuta
- Forward Email vs Proton Mail
- Forward Email vs Disroot
- Forward Email vs Infomaniak Mail
- Forward Email vs Soverin
- Forward Email vs Purelymail