Privacy Ratings

Webmail privacy ratings

Email clients that run in the browser, hosted or self-hosted.

10 webmail are rated against 14 public criteria, and 10 have enough evidence for a letter grade. Our pick is Forward Email Webmail. Of the 3 with a known jurisdiction, 2 are based in a Five Eyes country, and 3 in the wider Fourteen Eyes.

Open-source webmail only · Criteria for this category · Suggest an addition · Markdown

10 shown
Webmail privacy ratings, sorted by pick and then by grade
Name Grade Score Data Jurisdiction Open sourceNo trackers or telemetryNo ads or data salesIndependent auditTransparency reportTells users about requestsOpenPGP supportConnects directlyBlocks remote contentWorks with any providerSelf-hostableTLS configurationSecurity headersModern web standards
Hosted webmail for Forward Email accounts, with mail, calendar and contacts, built-in OpenPGP and optional encryption of locally cached data. It shares one source-available codebase with the Forward Email desktop and mobile apps.
Grade C 74 100% United States Five Eyes YesPartialYesYesPartialYesYesYesPartialNoPartialPartialPartialNot tested yet
Self-hosted, open-source groupware suite built on the Horde framework, with the IMP webmail client, mail filters, calendar, contacts, tasks and notes.
Grade B 89 100% – YesYesYesNoNot applicableNot applicableYesYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Self-hosted, IMAP-only webmail client forked from RainLoop, with built-in OpenPGP support.
Grade B 89 100% – YesYesYesNoNot applicableNot applicableYesYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Self-hosted, open-source webmail that combines several IMAP, JMAP and SMTP accounts, plus feeds, in one interface, built from optional modules.
Grade B 84 100% – YesYesYesNoNot applicableNot applicablePartialYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Open-source mail app for self-hosted Nextcloud servers that adds webmail for any IMAP account, with S/MIME, Mailvelope support and integration with Nextcloud contacts and calendar.
Grade B 84 100% Germany Fourteen Eyes YesYesYesNoNot applicableNot applicablePartialYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Browser-based multilingual IMAP client with an application-like user interface.
Grade B 84 100% – YesYesYesNoNot applicableNot applicablePartialYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Self-hosted PHP webmail with built-in IMAP and SMTP support that renders plain HTML pages without JavaScript and is extended through plugins.
Grade B 79 100% – YesYesYesNoNot applicableNot applicableNoYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Self-hosted, open-source PHP webmail for an existing IMAP server, with contacts, OpenPGP in the browser and a module system. A paid Pro edition adds more features.
Grade C 74 100% – YesNoYesNoNot applicableNot applicableYesYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Self-hosted, open-source groupware server with webmail, calendars and address books, supporting CalDAV, CardDAV and ActiveSync. It uses an existing IMAP server for mail.
Grade C 63 100% – YesNoYesNoNot applicableNot applicableNoYesYesYesYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Self-hosted email and collaboration server from Synacor, with a web client for mail, calendar, contacts and files. An open-source edition and a commercial Network Edition with extra features are offered.
Grade D 50 100% United States Five Eyes PartialNoYesNoNot applicableNot applicableNoYesYesNoYesNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable

Questions

What is the most private option among webmail?

Our pick is Forward Email Webmail. Source-available webmail with built-in OpenPGP and no third-party analytics, covered by Cure53's audit. It works only with Forward Email accounts, not other IMAP and SMTP providers.

How are webmail rated?

Each entry answers 14 questions: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, independent audit, transparency report, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, security headers, modern web standards, OpenPGP support, connects directly, blocks remote content, works with any provider and self-hostable. Answers need links to evidence. See the full criteria.

Does jurisdiction matter?

Jurisdiction decides which laws can compel a provider to hand over data. Each entry shows its country and whether it is in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes. The data a provider can hand over depends mostly on what it stores and who holds the keys. Read about jurisdictions and the CLOUD Act.

Comparisons