Privacy Ratings

Cal.com vs Cal.diy: privacy compared

Cal.com and Cal.diy are both rated in scheduling against the same 9 public criteria. Cal.com does better on independent audit. Cal.diy does better on open source and no trackers or telemetry.

Cal.com compared with Cal.diy
CriterionCal.com Our pickCal.diy
GradeGrade F F (38/100)Grade C C (65/100)
JurisdictionUnited States Five EyesUnknown
Open source
Is all the source code needed to run the product public?
No sourceYes source
No trackers or telemetry
Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default?
No sourcePartial source
No ads or data sales
Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data?
Yes sourceYes source
Independent audit
Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years?
Partial sourceNo
Transparency report
Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds?
NoNot applicable
Tells users about requests
Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it?
NoNot applicable
TLS configuration
Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better?
Yes sourceNot applicable
Security headers
Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better?
Yes sourceNot applicable
Modern web standards
Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test?
Not tested yetNot applicable

Summaries

Cal.com. Cal.com scores 38 out of 100 (grade F) on the scheduling criteria. It meets 3 of 8 criteria: no ads or data sales, TLS configuration and security headers. It partly meets independent audit. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+.

Cal.diy. Cal.diy scores 65 out of 100 (grade C) on the scheduling criteria. It meets 2 of 4 criteria: open source and no ads or data sales. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry. It does not meet independent audit.

Compare all 16 scheduling