Betterbird vs Claws Mail: privacy compared
Betterbird and Claws Mail are both rated in email clients against the same 8 public criteria.
| Criterion | Betterbird Our pick | Claws Mail |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade B B (89/100) | Grade B B (89/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany Fourteen Eyes | Unknown |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | No | No |
| OpenPGP support Can the app encrypt and sign mail with OpenPGP, built in or through an official add-on? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Connects directly Does the app connect directly to your mail server, without passing mail or passwords through the vendor's servers? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Blocks remote content Are remote images and tracking pixels blocked by default? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Works with any provider Does the app work with any standard IMAP and SMTP provider? | Yes source | Yes source |
Summaries
Betterbird. Betterbird scores 89 out of 100 (grade B) on the email clients criteria. It meets 7 of 8 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, OpenPGP support, connects directly, blocks remote content and works with any provider. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).
Claws Mail. Claws Mail scores 89 out of 100 (grade B) on the email clients criteria. It meets 7 of 8 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, OpenPGP support, connects directly, blocks remote content and works with any provider. It does not meet independent audit.