Privacy Ratings

Comp AI vs Thoropass: privacy compared

Comp AI and Thoropass are both rated in compliance automation against the same 9 public criteria. Comp AI is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Thoropass is based in the United States (Five Eyes).

Comp AI compared with Thoropass
CriterionComp AI Our pickThoropass
GradeGrade F F (35/100)Grade F F (24/100)
JurisdictionUnited States Five EyesUnited States Five Eyes
Open source
Is all the source code needed to run the product public?
Partial sourceNo
No trackers or telemetry
Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default?
No sourceNo source
No ads or data sales
Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data?
Partial sourcePartial source
Independent audit
Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years?
Partial sourceNo
Transparency report
Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds?
No sourceNo source
Tells users about requests
Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it?
NoNo
TLS configuration
Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better?
Yes sourceYes source
Security headers
Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better?
Partial sourcePartial source
Modern web standards
Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test?
No sourcePartial source

Which is more private, Comp AI or Thoropass?

Comp AI scores higher on the public criteria: 35 out of 100, against 24 for Thoropass. Comp AI does better on open source and independent audit. Thoropass does better on modern web standards. How scoring works

Summaries

Comp AI. Comp AI scores 35 out of 100 (grade F) on the compliance automation criteria. It meets 1 of 9 criteria: TLS configuration. It partly meets open source, no ads or data sales, independent audit and security headers. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, transparency report, tells users about requests and modern web standards. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B+ and Internet.nl website score 66%.

Thoropass. Thoropass scores 24 out of 100 (grade F) on the compliance automation criteria. It meets 1 of 9 criteria: TLS configuration. It partly meets no ads or data sales, security headers and modern web standards. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B and Internet.nl website score 80%.

Compare all 11 compliance automation

Comparisons