Privacy Ratings

Comp AI vs Probo: privacy compared

Comp AI and Probo are both rated in compliance automation against the same 9 public criteria. Comp AI is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Probo is based in the United States (Five Eyes).

Comp AI compared with Probo
CriterionComp AI Our pickProbo
GradeGrade F F (35/100)Grade D D (50/100)
JurisdictionUnited States Five EyesUnited States Five Eyes
Open source
Is all the source code needed to run the product public?
Partial sourceYes source
No trackers or telemetry
Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default?
No sourceNo source
No ads or data sales
Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data?
Partial sourceYes source
Independent audit
Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years?
Partial sourceNo
Transparency report
Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds?
No sourceNo source
Tells users about requests
Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it?
NoNo
TLS configuration
Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better?
Yes sourceYes source
Security headers
Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better?
Partial sourceYes source
Modern web standards
Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test?
No sourcePartial source

Which is more private, Comp AI or Probo?

Probo scores higher on the public criteria: 50 out of 100, against 35 for Comp AI. Comp AI does better on independent audit. Probo does better on open source, no ads or data sales, security headers and modern web standards. How scoring works

Summaries

Comp AI. Comp AI scores 35 out of 100 (grade F) on the compliance automation criteria. It meets 1 of 9 criteria: TLS configuration. It partly meets open source, no ads or data sales, independent audit and security headers. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, transparency report, tells users about requests and modern web standards. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B+ and Internet.nl website score 66%.

Probo. Probo scores 50 out of 100 (grade D) on the compliance automation criteria. It meets 4 of 9 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, TLS configuration and security headers. It partly meets modern web standards. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, independent audit, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+ and Internet.nl website score 80%.

Compare all 11 compliance automation

Comparisons