Tauri vs Kotlin Multiplatform: privacy compared
Tauri and Kotlin Multiplatform are both rated in cross-platform app frameworks against the same 4 public criteria. Tauri is based in the Netherlands (Nine Eyes); Kotlin Multiplatform is based in Czechia.
| Criterion | Tauri Our pick | Kotlin Multiplatform |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade B B (85/100) | Grade D D (50/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands Nine Eyes | Czechia Outside Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Partial source | No source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | Yes source | No |
Which is more private, Tauri or Kotlin Multiplatform?
Tauri scores higher on the public criteria: 85 out of 100, against 50 for Kotlin Multiplatform. Tauri does better on no trackers or telemetry and independent audit. How scoring works
Summaries
Tauri. Tauri scores 85 out of 100 (grade B) on the cross-platform app frameworks criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales and independent audit. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry. It is based in the Netherlands: Nine Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).
Kotlin Multiplatform. Kotlin Multiplatform scores 50 out of 100 (grade D) on the cross-platform app frameworks criteria. It meets 2 of 4 criteria: open source and no ads or data sales. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry and independent audit. It is based in Czechia: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes; EU member (GDPR).
Compare all 29 cross-platform app frameworks