Tauri vs Jetpack Compose: privacy compared
Tauri and Jetpack Compose are both rated in cross-platform app frameworks against the same 4 public criteria. Tauri is based in the Netherlands (Nine Eyes); Jetpack Compose is based in the United States (Five Eyes).
| Criterion | Tauri Our pick | Jetpack Compose |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade B B (85/100) | Grade D D (50/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands Nine Eyes | United States Five Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | Yes source |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Partial source | No source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | Yes source | No |
Which is more private, Tauri or Jetpack Compose?
Tauri scores higher on the public criteria: 85 out of 100, against 50 for Jetpack Compose. Tauri does better on no trackers or telemetry and independent audit. How scoring works
Summaries
Tauri. Tauri scores 85 out of 100 (grade B) on the cross-platform app frameworks criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales and independent audit. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry. It is based in the Netherlands: Nine Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).
Jetpack Compose. Jetpack Compose scores 50 out of 100 (grade D) on the cross-platform app frameworks criteria. It meets 2 of 4 criteria: open source and no ads or data sales. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry and independent audit. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act.
Compare all 29 cross-platform app frameworks