SpamScanner vs Check Point Email Security: privacy compared
SpamScanner and Check Point Email Security are both rated in spam and virus filtering against the same 9 public criteria.
| Criterion | SpamScanner Our pick | Check Point Email Security |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade B B (80/100) | Grade F F (32/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Israel Outside Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | No |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | Yes source | No source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | Partial source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | No | Partial source |
| Transparency report Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds? | Not applicable | No source |
| Tells users about requests Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it? | Not applicable | No |
| TLS configuration Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better? | Not applicable | Yes source |
| Security headers Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better? | Not applicable | Partial source |
| Modern web standards Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test? | Not applicable | Yes source |
Which is more private, SpamScanner or Check Point Email Security?
SpamScanner scores higher on the public criteria: 80 out of 100, against 32 for Check Point Email Security. SpamScanner does better on open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. Check Point Email Security does better on independent audit. Disclosure. Privacy Ratings is maintained by the team behind Forward Email, which also makes SpamScanner. This entry is scored by the same criteria as every other entry in this category, and changes to it are reviewed under the published conflict-of-interest rules. How scoring works
Summaries
SpamScanner. SpamScanner scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.
Check Point Email Security. Check Point Email Security scores 32 out of 100 (grade F) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 2 of 9 criteria: TLS configuration and modern web standards. It partly meets no ads or data sales, independent audit and security headers. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in Israel: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B+ and Internet.nl website score 98%.
Compare all 26 spam and virus filtering
Comparisons
- SpamScanner vs Amavis
- SpamScanner vs Apache SpamAssassin
- SpamScanner vs MailScanner
- SpamScanner vs Rspamd
- SpamScanner vs Proxmox Mail Gateway
- SpamScanner vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365
- SpamScanner vs Abnormal Inbound Email Security
- SpamScanner vs Proofpoint Email Protection
- SpamScanner vs DuoCircle
- SpamScanner vs Darktrace / EMAIL
- SpamScanner vs Barracuda Email Protection
- SpamScanner vs FortiMail