Bitwarden vs Google Password Manager: privacy compared
Bitwarden and Google Password Manager are both rated in password managers against the same 12 public criteria. Bitwarden does better on open source, no ads or data sales, independent audit, TLS configuration, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. Google Password Manager does better on transparency report and tells users about requests. Bitwarden is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Google Password Manager is based in the United States (Five Eyes).
| Criterion | Bitwarden Our pick | Google Password Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade C C (73/100) | Grade F F (30/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States Five Eyes | United States Five Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | No |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | No source | No source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | No source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | Yes source | No |
| Transparency report Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds? | No | Yes source |
| Tells users about requests Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it? | No | Yes source |
| TLS configuration Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Partial source |
| Security headers Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Modern web standards Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test? | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| End-to-end encrypted vault Is the vault encrypted on the device before it is synced, with a key the provider does not hold? | Yes source | No source |
| Local or self-hosted option Can the vault be kept locally or on your own server? | Yes source | Partial source |
| Full export Can every item be exported in an open format? | Yes source | Partial source |
Summaries
Bitwarden. Bitwarden scores 73 out of 100 (grade C) on the password managers criteria. It meets 8 of 11 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, independent audit, TLS configuration, security headers, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+.
Google Password Manager. Google Password Manager scores 30 out of 100 (grade F) on the password managers criteria. It meets 3 of 11 criteria: transparency report, tells users about requests and security headers. It partly meets TLS configuration, local or self-hosted option and full export. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, independent audit and end-to-end encrypted vault. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade B and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+.