Bitwarden vs Apple Passwords: privacy compared
Bitwarden and Apple Passwords are both rated in password managers against the same 12 public criteria. Bitwarden is based in the United States (Five Eyes); Apple Passwords is based in the United States (Five Eyes).
| Criterion | Bitwarden Our pick | Apple Passwords |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | Grade C C (72/100) | Grade C C (61/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States Five Eyes | United States Five Eyes |
| Open source Is all the source code needed to run the product public? | Yes source | No |
| No trackers or telemetry Are the website and apps free of third-party trackers, with any analytics anonymous and any telemetry off by default? | No source | Partial source |
| No ads or data sales Is the product funded without advertising, ad targeting or selling user data? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Independent audit Has an independent security or privacy audit been published within the last three years? | Yes source | No |
| Transparency report Does the provider regularly publish how many government and legal requests it receives and how it responds? | No | Yes source |
| Tells users about requests Does the provider promise to tell users about requests for their data, unless a court forbids it? | No | Yes source |
| TLS configuration Does the website pass the Qualys SSL Labs test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Security headers Does the website pass the Mozilla HTTP Observatory test with a grade of A or better? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Modern web standards Does the website score 90% or higher on the Internet.nl website test? | Partial source | No source |
| End-to-end encrypted vault Is the vault encrypted on the device before it is synced, with a key the provider does not hold? | Yes source | Yes source |
| Local or self-hosted option Can the vault be kept locally or on your own server? | Yes source | Partial source |
| Full export Can every item be exported in an open format? | Yes source | Partial source |
Which is more private, Bitwarden or Apple Passwords?
Bitwarden scores higher on the public criteria: 72 out of 100, against 61 for Apple Passwords. Bitwarden does better on open source, independent audit, modern web standards, local or self-hosted option and full export. Apple Passwords does better on no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. How scoring works
Summaries
Bitwarden. Bitwarden scores 72 out of 100 (grade C) on the password managers criteria. It meets 8 of 12 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, independent audit, TLS configuration, security headers, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. It partly meets modern web standards. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+ and Internet.nl website score 76%.
Apple Passwords. Apple Passwords scores 61 out of 100 (grade C) on the password managers criteria. It meets 6 of 12 criteria: no ads or data sales, transparency report, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, security headers and end-to-end encrypted vault. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry, local or self-hosted option and full export. It does not meet open source, independent audit and modern web standards. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+, Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+ and Internet.nl website score 64%.
Compare all 26 password managers
Comparisons
- Apple Passwords alternatives
- Browserpass vs Bitwarden
- Browserpass vs Apple Passwords
- Bitwarden vs KeePassium
- Bitwarden vs KeePassXC
- Bitwarden vs KeePassDX
- Bitwarden vs Password Safe
- Bitwarden vs Strongbox
- Bitwarden vs Vaultwarden
- Bitwarden vs Proton Pass
- Bitwarden vs 2of3 by Ente
- Bitwarden vs PaperVault
- Bitwarden vs AliasVault