# Upptime vs Pingdom: privacy compared

| Criterion | Upptime | Pingdom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (78/100) | F (13/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Partial | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | No |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Runs on your own infrastructure | Yes | No |
| No visitor tracking | Yes | No |
| Public uptime history | Yes | Yes |

**Upptime.** Upptime scores 78 out of 100 (grade B) on the status pages and uptime monitoring criteria. It meets 5 of 7 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, runs on your own infrastructure, no visitor tracking and public uptime history. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry. It does not meet independent audit.

**Pingdom.** Pingdom scores 13 out of 100 (grade F) on the status pages and uptime monitoring criteria. It meets 1 of 7 criteria: public uptime history. It partly meets independent audit. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, runs on your own infrastructure and no visitor tracking. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/status-pages/upptime-vs-pingdom/