# Upptime vs Healthchecks.io: privacy compared

| Criterion | Upptime | Healthchecks.io |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (78/100) | B (84/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Latvia |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| No trackers or telemetry | Partial | Yes |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| Runs on your own infrastructure | Yes | Yes |
| No visitor tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Public uptime history | Yes | Partial |

**Upptime.** Upptime scores 78 out of 100 (grade B) on the status pages and uptime monitoring criteria. It meets 5 of 7 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, runs on your own infrastructure, no visitor tracking and public uptime history. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry. It does not meet independent audit.

**Healthchecks.io.** Healthchecks.io scores 84 out of 100 (grade B) on the status pages and uptime monitoring criteria. It meets 5 of 7 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, runs on your own infrastructure and no visitor tracking. It partly meets public uptime history. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in Latvia: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes; EU member (GDPR).

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/status-pages/upptime-vs-healthchecks-io/