# Upptime vs Atlassian Statuspage: privacy compared

| Criterion | Upptime | Atlassian Statuspage |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (78/100) | F (19/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Partial | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Partial |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Runs on your own infrastructure | Yes | No |
| No visitor tracking | Yes | No |
| Public uptime history | Yes | Yes |

**Upptime.** Upptime scores 78 out of 100 (grade B) on the status pages and uptime monitoring criteria. It meets 5 of 7 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, runs on your own infrastructure, no visitor tracking and public uptime history. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry. It does not meet independent audit.

**Atlassian Statuspage.** Atlassian Statuspage scores 19 out of 100 (grade F) on the status pages and uptime monitoring criteria. It meets 1 of 7 criteria: public uptime history. It partly meets no ads or data sales and independent audit. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, runs on your own infrastructure and no visitor tracking.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/status-pages/upptime-vs-atlassian-statuspage/