# SpamScanner vs Proofpoint Email Protection: privacy compared

| Criterion | SpamScanner | Proofpoint Email Protection |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (80/100) | D (41/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Partial |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | Partial |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | Yes |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Yes |
| Security headers | Not applicable | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not tested yet |

**SpamScanner.** SpamScanner scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.

**Proofpoint Email Protection.** Proofpoint Email Protection scores 41 out of 100 (grade D) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 2 of 8 criteria: tells users about requests and TLS configuration. It partly meets no ads or data sales, independent audit, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet open source and no trackers or telemetry. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/spam-filters/spamscanner-vs-proofpoint-email-protection/