# SpamScanner vs Libraesva: privacy compared

| Criterion | SpamScanner | Libraesva |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (80/100) | F (20/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Italy (Fourteen Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Security headers | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not applicable |

**SpamScanner.** SpamScanner scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.

**Libraesva.** Libraesva scores 20 out of 100 (grade F) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 1 of 4 criteria: no ads or data sales. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry and independent audit. It is based in Italy: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/spam-filters/spamscanner-vs-libraesva/