# SpamScanner vs Cisco Secure Email: privacy compared

| Criterion | SpamScanner | Cisco Secure Email |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (80/100) | F (10/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Partial |
| Independent audit | No | Unknown |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Security headers | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not applicable |

**SpamScanner.** SpamScanner scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.

**Cisco Secure Email.** Cisco Secure Email scores 10 out of 100 (grade F) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It partly meets no ads or data sales. It does not meet open source and no trackers or telemetry. Still needing evidence: independent audit. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/spam-filters/spamscanner-vs-cisco-secure-email/