# SpamScanner vs Check Point Email Security: privacy compared

| Criterion | SpamScanner | Check Point Email Security |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (80/100) | F (28/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Israel |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Partial |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | No |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | No |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Yes |
| Security headers | Not applicable | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not tested yet |

**SpamScanner.** SpamScanner scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.

**Check Point Email Security.** Check Point Email Security scores 28 out of 100 (grade F) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 1 of 8 criteria: TLS configuration. It partly meets no ads or data sales, independent audit and security headers. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in Israel: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/spam-filters/spamscanner-vs-check-point-harmony-email/