# SpamScanner vs Barracuda Email Protection: privacy compared

| Criterion | SpamScanner | Barracuda Email Protection |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (80/100) | F (31/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Partial |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | Partial |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | Yes |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Partial |
| Security headers | Not applicable | No |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not tested yet |

**SpamScanner.** SpamScanner scores 80 out of 100 (grade B) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It does not meet independent audit.

**Barracuda Email Protection.** Barracuda Email Protection scores 31 out of 100 (grade F) on the spam and virus filtering criteria. It meets 1 of 8 criteria: tells users about requests. It partly meets no ads or data sales, independent audit, transparency report and TLS configuration. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry and security headers. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade B and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade D-.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/spam-filters/spamscanner-vs-barracuda-email-protection/