# DataPacket vs Njalla: privacy compared

| Criterion | DataPacket | Njalla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | D (43/100) | D (48/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom (Five Eyes) | Costa Rica |
| Open source | No | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | No | Yes |
| No ads or data sales | Partial | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| Transparency report | Partial | No |
| Tells users about requests | Yes | No |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Security headers | Partial | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| Mail-friendly (port 25) | Yes | No |
| Reverse DNS | Yes | No |
| IPv6 | Yes | Yes |
| Anonymous payment | No | Yes |

**DataPacket.** DataPacket scores 43 out of 100 (grade D) on the server hosting criteria. It meets 5 of 12 criteria: tells users about requests, TLS configuration, mail-friendly (port 25), Reverse DNS and IPv6. It partly meets no ads or data sales, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit and anonymous payment. It is based in the United Kingdom: Five Eyes member; GDPR-style data protection law; CLOUD Act data access agreement with the US. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

**Njalla.** Njalla scores 48 out of 100 (grade D) on the server hosting criteria. It meets 5 of 12 criteria: no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, TLS configuration, IPv6 and anonymous payment. It partly meets security headers. It does not meet open source, independent audit, transparency report, tells users about requests, mail-friendly (port 25) and Reverse DNS. It is based in Costa Rica: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B+.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/server-hosting/datapacket-vs-njalla/