# DataPacket vs Exoscale: privacy compared

| Criterion | DataPacket | Exoscale |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | D (43/100) | C (65/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom (Five Eyes) | Switzerland |
| Open source | No | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | No | Yes |
| No ads or data sales | Partial | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Transparency report | Partial | Partial |
| Tells users about requests | Yes | Yes |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Security headers | Partial | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| Mail-friendly (port 25) | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse DNS | Yes | Partial |
| IPv6 | Yes | Yes |
| Anonymous payment | No | No |

**DataPacket.** DataPacket scores 43 out of 100 (grade D) on the server hosting criteria. It meets 5 of 12 criteria: tells users about requests, TLS configuration, mail-friendly (port 25), Reverse DNS and IPv6. It partly meets no ads or data sales, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit and anonymous payment. It is based in the United Kingdom: Five Eyes member; GDPR-style data protection law; CLOUD Act data access agreement with the US. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

**Exoscale.** Exoscale scores 65 out of 100 (grade C) on the server hosting criteria. It meets 6 of 12 criteria: no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, mail-friendly (port 25) and IPv6. It partly meets independent audit, transparency report, security headers and Reverse DNS. It does not meet open source and anonymous payment. It is based in Switzerland: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes; GDPR-style data protection law. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/server-hosting/datapacket-vs-exoscale/