# DataPacket vs Bunker: privacy compared

| Criterion | DataPacket | Bunker |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | D (43/100) | D (40/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom (Five Eyes) | France (Nine Eyes) |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| No trackers or telemetry | No | Partial |
| No ads or data sales | Partial | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| Transparency report | Partial | No |
| Tells users about requests | Yes | No |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Partial |
| Security headers | Partial | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| Mail-friendly (port 25) | Yes | No |
| Reverse DNS | Yes | No |
| IPv6 | Yes | No |
| Anonymous payment | No | No |

**DataPacket.** DataPacket scores 43 out of 100 (grade D) on the server hosting criteria. It meets 5 of 12 criteria: tells users about requests, TLS configuration, mail-friendly (port 25), Reverse DNS and IPv6. It partly meets no ads or data sales, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit and anonymous payment. It is based in the United Kingdom: Five Eyes member; GDPR-style data protection law; CLOUD Act data access agreement with the US. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

**Bunker.** Bunker scores 40 out of 100 (grade D) on the server hosting criteria. It meets 2 of 12 criteria: open source and no ads or data sales. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry, TLS configuration and security headers. It does not meet independent audit, transparency report, tells users about requests, mail-friendly (port 25), Reverse DNS, IPv6 and anonymous payment. It is based in France: Nine Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade B and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/server-hosting/datapacket-vs-bunker/