# Cure53 vs IOActive: privacy compared

| Criterion | Cure53 | IOActive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | A (100/100) | F (14/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Publishes full reports | Yes | No |
| Audits open-source projects | Yes | No |
| Public research | Yes | Yes |
| No trackers on website | Yes | No |

**Cure53.** Cure53 scores 100 out of 100 (grade A) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 4 of 4 criteria: publishes full reports, audits open-source projects, public research and no trackers on website. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

**IOActive.** IOActive scores 14 out of 100 (grade F) on the security audit firms criteria. It meets 1 of 4 criteria: public research. It does not meet publishes full reports, audits open-source projects and no trackers on website. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/security-audit-firms/cure53-vs-ioactive/