# DuckDuckGo vs Ecosia: privacy compared

| Criterion | DuckDuckGo | Ecosia |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | C (73/100) | D (41/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States (Five Eyes) | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) |
| Open source | Partial | Partial |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Partial | Partial |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| Transparency report | Partial | No |
| Tells users about requests | Yes | No |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Security headers | Partial | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| No search history logs | Yes | Partial |
| No profile-based ads | Yes | Yes |
| No account needed | Yes | Partial |

**DuckDuckGo.** DuckDuckGo scores 73 out of 100 (grade C) on the search engines criteria. It meets 6 of 11 criteria: no trackers or telemetry, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, no search history logs, no profile-based ads and no account needed. It partly meets open source, no ads or data sales, transparency report and security headers. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

**Ecosia.** Ecosia scores 41 out of 100 (grade D) on the search engines criteria. It meets 2 of 11 criteria: TLS configuration and no profile-based ads. It partly meets open source, no ads or data sales, security headers, no search history logs and no account needed. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, independent audit, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/search-engines/duckduckgo-vs-ecosia/