# Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments: privacy compared

| Criterion | Cal.com | Easy!Appointments |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | F (38/100) | D (50/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States (Five Eyes) | Unknown |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| No trackers or telemetry | No | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | Partial | No |
| Transparency report | No | Not applicable |
| Tells users about requests | No | Not applicable |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Not applicable |
| Security headers | Yes | Not applicable |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not applicable |

**Cal.com.** Cal.com scores 38 out of 100 (grade F) on the scheduling criteria. It meets 3 of 8 criteria: no ads or data sales, TLS configuration and security headers. It partly meets independent audit. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+.

**Easy!Appointments.** Easy!Appointments scores 50 out of 100 (grade D) on the scheduling criteria. It meets 2 of 4 criteria: open source and no ads or data sales. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry and independent audit.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/scheduling/cal-com-vs-easy-appointments/