# Cal.com vs Acuity Scheduling: privacy compared

| Criterion | Cal.com | Acuity Scheduling |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | F (38/100) | F (28/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States (Five Eyes) | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | No | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | No | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Partial |
| Independent audit | Partial | No |
| Transparency report | No | No |
| Tells users about requests | No | Yes |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Security headers | Yes | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |

**Cal.com.** Cal.com scores 38 out of 100 (grade F) on the scheduling criteria. It meets 3 of 8 criteria: no ads or data sales, TLS configuration and security headers. It partly meets independent audit. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+.

**Acuity Scheduling.** Acuity Scheduling scores 28 out of 100 (grade F) on the scheduling criteria. It meets 2 of 8 criteria: tells users about requests and TLS configuration. It partly meets no ads or data sales and security headers. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, independent audit and transparency report. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B+.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/scheduling/cal-com-vs-acuity-scheduling/