# Browserpass vs Psono: privacy compared

| Criterion | Browserpass | Psono |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (88/100) | D (55/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | Partial |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | No |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | No |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Yes |
| Security headers | Not applicable | Yes |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not tested yet |
| End-to-end encrypted vault | Yes | Yes |
| Local or self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Full export | Yes | Partial |

**Browserpass.** Browserpass scores 88 out of 100 (grade B) on the password managers criteria. It meets 6 of 7 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. It does not meet independent audit.

**Psono.** Psono scores 55 out of 100 (grade D) on the password managers criteria. It meets 5 of 11 criteria: no ads or data sales, TLS configuration, security headers, end-to-end encrypted vault and local or self-hosted option. It partly meets open source and full export. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, independent audit, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/password-managers/browserpass-vs-psono/