# Browserpass vs Padloc: privacy compared

| Criterion | Browserpass | Padloc |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (88/100) | C (68/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | No |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | No |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Yes |
| Security headers | Not applicable | Yes |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not tested yet |
| End-to-end encrypted vault | Yes | Yes |
| Local or self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Full export | Yes | Yes |

**Browserpass.** Browserpass scores 88 out of 100 (grade B) on the password managers criteria. It meets 6 of 7 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. It does not meet independent audit.

**Padloc.** Padloc scores 68 out of 100 (grade C) on the password managers criteria. It meets 7 of 11 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, TLS configuration, security headers, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. It partly meets independent audit. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade A+.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/password-managers/browserpass-vs-padloc/