# Browserpass vs KeePassium: privacy compared

| Criterion | Browserpass | KeePassium |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (88/100) | A (100/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | Luxembourg |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | Yes |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | Yes |
| Transparency report | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Tells users about requests | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| TLS configuration | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Security headers | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Modern web standards | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| End-to-end encrypted vault | Yes | Yes |
| Local or self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Full export | Yes | Yes |

**Browserpass.** Browserpass scores 88 out of 100 (grade B) on the password managers criteria. It meets 6 of 7 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. It does not meet independent audit.

**KeePassium.** KeePassium scores 100 out of 100 (grade A) on the password managers criteria. It meets 7 of 7 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, independent audit, end-to-end encrypted vault, local or self-hosted option and full export. It is based in Luxembourg: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes; EU member (GDPR).

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/password-managers/browserpass-vs-keepassium/