# Tailscale vs tinc: privacy compared

| Criterion | Tailscale | tinc |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | D (50/100) | B (88/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Five Eyes) | Unknown |
| Open source | Partial | Yes |
| No trackers or telemetry | No | Yes |
| No ads or data sales | Partial | Yes |
| Independent audit | Partial | No |
| Keys stay on devices | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted coordination server | Partial | Yes |
| No connection logs by default | Partial | Yes |

**Tailscale.** Tailscale scores 50 out of 100 (grade D) on the mesh VPNs and private networks criteria. It meets 1 of 7 criteria: keys stay on devices. It partly meets open source, no ads or data sales, independent audit, self-hosted coordination server and no connection logs by default. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry. It is based in Canada: Five Eyes member.

**tinc.** tinc scores 88 out of 100 (grade B) on the mesh VPNs and private networks criteria. It meets 6 of 7 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, keys stay on devices, self-hosted coordination server and no connection logs by default. It does not meet independent audit.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/mesh-vpns/tailscale-vs-tinc/