# Headscale vs Cloudflare Mesh: privacy compared

| Criterion | Headscale | Cloudflare Mesh |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (82/100) | F (18/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Unknown | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Partial |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Keys stay on devices | Yes | No |
| Self-hosted coordination server | Yes | No |
| No connection logs by default | Partial | Partial |

**Headscale.** Headscale scores 82 out of 100 (grade B) on the mesh VPNs and private networks criteria. It meets 5 of 7 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, keys stay on devices and self-hosted coordination server. It partly meets no connection logs by default. It does not meet independent audit.

**Cloudflare Mesh.** Cloudflare Mesh scores 18 out of 100 (grade F) on the mesh VPNs and private networks criteria. It partly meets no ads or data sales, independent audit and no connection logs by default. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, keys stay on devices and self-hosted coordination server. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/mesh-vpns/headscale-vs-cloudflare-mesh/
