# Betterbird vs Sylpheed: privacy compared

| Criterion | Betterbird | Sylpheed |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (89/100) | C (72/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) | Unknown |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| OpenPGP support | Yes | Yes |
| Connects directly | Yes | Yes |
| Blocks remote content | Yes | Yes |
| Works with any provider | Yes | Yes |

**Betterbird.** Betterbird scores 89 out of 100 (grade B) on the email clients criteria. It meets 7 of 8 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, OpenPGP support, connects directly, blocks remote content and works with any provider. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).

**Sylpheed.** Sylpheed scores 72 out of 100 (grade C) on the email clients criteria. It meets 6 of 8 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales, OpenPGP support, connects directly, blocks remote content and works with any provider. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry and independent audit.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/email-clients/betterbird-vs-sylpheed/