# Betterbird vs Mimestream: privacy compared

| Criterion | Betterbird | Mimestream |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (89/100) | D (50/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | Yes |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| OpenPGP support | Yes | No |
| Connects directly | Yes | Partial |
| Blocks remote content | Yes | Partial |
| Works with any provider | Yes | Partial |

**Betterbird.** Betterbird scores 89 out of 100 (grade B) on the email clients criteria. It meets 7 of 8 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, OpenPGP support, connects directly, blocks remote content and works with any provider. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).

**Mimestream.** Mimestream scores 50 out of 100 (grade D) on the email clients criteria. It meets 2 of 8 criteria: no trackers or telemetry and no ads or data sales. It partly meets independent audit, connects directly, blocks remote content and works with any provider. It does not meet open source and OpenPGP support. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/email-clients/betterbird-vs-mimestream/