# Betterbird vs Canary Mail: privacy compared

| Criterion | Betterbird | Canary Mail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (89/100) | D (42/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) | Singapore |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| OpenPGP support | Yes | Yes |
| Connects directly | Yes | Partial |
| Blocks remote content | Yes | Partial |
| Works with any provider | Yes | Yes |

**Betterbird.** Betterbird scores 89 out of 100 (grade B) on the email clients criteria. It meets 7 of 8 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, OpenPGP support, connects directly, blocks remote content and works with any provider. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).

**Canary Mail.** Canary Mail scores 42 out of 100 (grade D) on the email clients criteria. It meets 3 of 8 criteria: no ads or data sales, OpenPGP support and works with any provider. It partly meets connects directly and blocks remote content. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry and independent audit. It is based in Singapore: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/email-clients/betterbird-vs-canary-mail/