# Documenso vs Adobe Acrobat Sign: privacy compared

| Criterion | Documenso | Adobe Acrobat Sign |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | D (56/100) | F (38/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States (Five Eyes) | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Partial | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | No |
| Independent audit | No | Partial |
| Transparency report | No | Yes |
| Tells users about requests | No | Yes |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Security headers | Partial | No |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |

**Documenso.** Documenso scores 56 out of 100 (grade D) on the electronic signatures criteria. It meets 3 of 8 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales and TLS configuration. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry and security headers. It does not meet independent audit, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

**Adobe Acrobat Sign.** Adobe Acrobat Sign scores 38 out of 100 (grade F) on the electronic signatures criteria. It meets 3 of 8 criteria: transparency report, tells users about requests and TLS configuration. It partly meets independent audit. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales and security headers. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade D+.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/e-signatures/documenso-vs-adobe-acrobat-sign/