# Cloudflare Registrar vs Joker.com: privacy compared

| Criterion | Cloudflare Registrar | Joker.com |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | C (66/100) | D (45/100) |
| Jurisdiction | United States (Five Eyes) | Germany (Fourteen Eyes) |
| Open source | No | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | No | Partial |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | Partial | No |
| Transparency report | Yes | No |
| Tells users about requests | Yes | No |
| TLS configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Security headers | Partial | Partial |
| Modern web standards | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| Free WHOIS privacy | Yes | Partial |
| Honest renewal pricing | Yes | Partial |
| Two-factor login | Yes | Yes |
| Transfer and registry lock | Yes | Partial |

**Cloudflare Registrar.** Cloudflare Registrar scores 66 out of 100 (grade C) on the domain registrars criteria. It meets 8 of 12 criteria: no ads or data sales, transparency report, tells users about requests, TLS configuration, Free WHOIS privacy, honest renewal pricing, two-factor login and transfer and registry lock. It partly meets independent audit and security headers. It does not meet open source and no trackers or telemetry. It is based in the United States: Five Eyes member; subject to the US CLOUD Act. Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B+.

**Joker.com.** Joker.com scores 45 out of 100 (grade D) on the domain registrars criteria. It meets 3 of 12 criteria: no ads or data sales, TLS configuration and two-factor login. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry, security headers, Free WHOIS privacy, honest renewal pricing and transfer and registry lock. It does not meet open source, independent audit, transparency report and tells users about requests. It is based in Germany: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR). Automated tests: SSL Labs grade A+ and Mozilla HTTP Observatory grade B.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/domain-registrars/cloudflare-registrar-vs-joker-com/