# Mullvad Browser vs Samsung Browser: privacy compared

| Criterion | Mullvad Browser | Samsung Browser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | A (90/100) | F (8/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Sweden (Fourteen Eyes) | South Korea |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| No trackers or telemetry | Yes | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | No |
| Independent audit | No | No |
| Blocks trackers by default | Yes | Partial |
| Fingerprinting protection | Yes | No |
| No calls to big-tech services | Yes | No |
| Timely security updates | Yes | No |

**Mullvad Browser.** Mullvad Browser scores 90 out of 100 (grade A) on the browsers criteria. It meets 7 of 8 criteria: open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, blocks trackers by default, fingerprinting protection, no calls to big-tech services and timely security updates. It does not meet independent audit. It is based in Sweden: Fourteen Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).

**Samsung Browser.** Samsung Browser scores 8 out of 100 (grade F) on the browsers criteria. It partly meets blocks trackers by default. It does not meet open source, no trackers or telemetry, no ads or data sales, independent audit, fingerprinting protection, no calls to big-tech services and timely security updates. It is based in South Korea: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes.

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/browsers/mullvad-browser-vs-samsung-internet/