# Tauri vs Qt: privacy compared

| Criterion | Tauri | Qt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grade | B (85/100) | F (35/100) |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands (Nine Eyes) | Finland |
| Open source | Yes | Partial |
| No trackers or telemetry | Partial | No |
| No ads or data sales | Yes | Yes |
| Independent audit | Yes | No |

**Tauri.** Tauri scores 85 out of 100 (grade B) on the cross-platform app frameworks criteria. It meets 3 of 4 criteria: open source, no ads or data sales and independent audit. It partly meets no trackers or telemetry. It is based in the Netherlands: Nine Eyes member; EU member (GDPR).

**Qt.** Qt scores 35 out of 100 (grade F) on the cross-platform app frameworks criteria. It meets 1 of 4 criteria: no ads or data sales. It partly meets open source. It does not meet no trackers or telemetry and independent audit. It is based in Finland: Not in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes; EU member (GDPR).

Source: https://privacyratings.com/compare/app-frameworks/tauri-vs-qt/